In Defense of Gay Sheep

January 2nd, 2007 at 5:21 pm by Mark
Tags: , , , , ,

Pink Sheep

     This article from the Britain Sunday Times

[Tennis-star, Martina] Navratilova defended the “right” of sheep to be gay.

     *cough*

     Do gay sheep bleat with a lisp?


6 Responses to “In Defense of Gay Sheep”

  1. Sam Kelter Says:

    Just wait til they get hold of this for the upcoming Disney flick, “Babe 2.”

    Now it’s a ram with a sexual identity crisis.

    “Oh, no, Bah Ram YOU, honey!” -snap- -snap-

  2. Mark Says:

    BWAHAHA Sweet! “Babe 2: Pink Sheep in the Family” 😉

  3. Pirate Princess Niki Says:

    ROFLMAO! You are BAAAAAAAAAAAD, Mark! Speaking of pink sheep, Bill’s wearing a pink sheet to his own toga party. LOL I said, “Only real men wear pink, Bill?” He said, “Exactly.” Hahaha Naked Twister! It’s on! See you at the Half Barrel tonight. Coyote Joe’s apparently thought we need a new floor… Did we wear the last one out?

    P. S.–It’s three snaps in a Z formation, biotch! Hahaha

  4. newmanj Says:

    PETA’s big lie:

    Just so you know. The false suggestion that the research is aimed at curing homosexuality was made by PETA. Yes, the animal rights group.

    Of course PETA has their own motives for receiving press on this story. In fact, PETA heavily edited quotes by the researchers and even fabricated information to generate press coverage. Many weeks ago, a writer in the states looked into PETA false claims.

    Here’s what he found.

  5. Mark Says:

    Brilliant! Appreciate that.

    Typical PETA. *shakes head* Because, as you know, it’s all a Right-Wing Bible-Thumbing Republican-Christan Patriarchal-Archetypical Conspiracy to make us all wear leather shoes. *rolls eyes* The funny thing to me is, they’ve always seemed more dictatorial, conspiratorial and fanatical than *any* of the groups they oppose.

    Sheep jerky, anyone? 😉

  6. newmanj Says:

    In regards to the Sunday Times article which has now become the source of wild conspiracy theories, I am pleased that a writer has thoroughly investigated the article. As he reports, the Sunday Times article is filled with major errors and false claims. His analysis also raises important questions about the timing of the article which comes almost five years after the research was actually conducted.

    Here’s a link to that analysis that anyone who is interested in this topic should read:

    A wolf in gay sheep’s clothing: Corruption at the London Times