July 13th, 2006 at 4:22 pm by Mark
Tags: 9/11, antidisestablishmentarian, asshats, blogitude, conspiracy-theory, humor, instapinch, moonbats, terrorism
Since I posted about the joint effort between Blogitude.com & Instapinch.com making it a special point to lambast the 9//11 Revisionist, Spook911, there have been several new developments. Foremost has been the revelation that Spooked claims to be a “biomedical researcher,” which should indicate that he has some grasp of Physics and Scientific Process.
Fortunately for us, he doesn’t.
On July 9th, Pinch posted some links to Spook’s first experiment. The experiment — using a bucket, some bent wire coathangers and gasoline — intended to disprove the fact that the WTC frame was made structurally inert by a hydrocarbon fire.
This, however, was merely a predecessor to the “better model,” which Pinch pointed out on June 28th. This experiment — using an empty rabbit cage and kerosene — intended to prove the same. The rabbit cage was his “better model” of the wire-frame construction of the WTC.
Using moonbat logic, the following things come to mind:
- In the 1987 movie Fatal Attraction, an infatuated woman boils a family pet — a rabbit. This also resulted in an empty rabbit cage.
- Rabbit cages usually hold rabbits, which were used to test for pregnancy from 1927 onward, thus the phrase “Rabbit test.”
- Wire coathangers have been increasingly difficult to find since the 1981 cinematic release of Mommy Dearest.
- Star of Fatal Attraction, Michael Douglas, married Catherine Zeta-Jones. The movie Rabbit Test stars Joan Rivers. Mommy Dearest was the story of an abusive mother, Joan Crawford.
More facts:
- Rabbits are usually stuck with needles either in injecting placental blood during a rabbit test, to sedate them prior to killing them or when injecting them with substances during Biomedical Research.
- Wire coat hangers are often used in makeshift drug laboratories to hold buckets and beakers over flame during the production of illicit drugs due to the fact that real laboratory equipment is extremely expensive.
- “To jones” (two Joans, and an outright Jones) is to show physical symptons due to a physical or mental dependence, i.e. “to jones for a fix.”
Using moonbat logic and taking into account needles, wire coat hangers, buckets and “jones,” I have deduced that Spook is a methamphetamine addict.
The evidence is right there!
Add to Favorites |
Permalink
| 2 Comments
March 1st, 2006 at 4:42 pm by Mark
Tags: 9/11, antidisestablishmentarian, asshats, blogitude, conspiracy-theory, instapinch, moonbats, smoking, terrorism
Blogitude and Instapinch are stirring up a hornet’s nest of “tinfoil hats,” “asshats” and “moonbats.”
Their target is the retarded weiner who wrote the 9/11 Revisionist Blog at Humint Events Online, although, now a few more idiots have entered the fray. Pretty much, I don’t find 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists humourous in the least, so I’m happy to lend my size ten-and-a-half to any butt that needs kicking.
When it all went down, I was in an armpit of a foreign country getting nothing but torrents of hatred and saliva directed at me by asinine Socialists in their wannabe-first-world country. I couldn’t so much as try to get a pack of smokes without hearing crap about how I, as an American, “got what you deserved!” Getting spit on really doesn’t do it for me.
You put up with a bit of that, one of two things is going to happen. In the first instance, maybe you’ll get a thicker skin and learn to ignore the morons. In the second, you’re gonna wanna hit people. Hit them really hard. Then hit them again. And maybe a few more times, for good measure. Ask their friends if they want any. Then stomp them. Berate them the entire time. Then spit on them.
I swear, I get in more trouble trying to buy cigarettes than anyone I’ve ever known.
Add to Favorites |
Permalink
| Comments Off on 9/11 Revisionists vs. Right-Minded Individuals in 2006 BlogWar
February 28th, 2006 at 8:58 am by Sam
Tags: 9/11, antidisestablishmentarian, asshats, blogitude, conspiracy-theory, instapinch, moonbats, terrorism
Better late than never, I ran across a blog entry from February 3rd that was just too good to pass up: “The BEST Tinfoil Hat Post Ever!”
In the article, Instapinch links to, and properly lambasts, some asshat from the Midwest (known only as Spooked) who, for reasons neither known nor understandable, adamantly clings to the idea that the World Trade Centers were destroyed by controlled demolition and were never hit by airplanes. Truly, Spooked deserves the Dummkopfen of the Month award for February 2006; but after reading a few more entries, such as how the Pentagon was never hit by a plane either, this may well spill over into June.
Furthermore, this asshat, Spooked, has the gall to sit from his safe little Midwest vantage point and tell the thousands of us who were driving on I-395 and the GW (I was on the way to Crystal City from downtown, mind you) that we are, in fact, mistaken. Apparently we’re all fools, the thousands of us. I mean, we should have just closed our eyes and waited for this Midwest Super Genius to tell us what happened! It must have been the Great GW’s mind control that made us see “a plane” go down at the Pentagon. The flames and soot certainly must have been “controlled demolition.” Doesn’t that make so much more sense?
I feel that people like Spooked are dangerous, and need to be put away. I’m not even going to link to the asshat — I feel I’m already giving him enough fuel by expressing my displeasure, so check out Instapinch for the skinny.
Good job, Pinch. Keep ripping him a new one!
Add to Favorites |
Permalink
| 20 Comments